Automated Market Makers (AMMs)

This is a segment from the Lightspeed newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.

Automated market makers (AMMs) offer continuous market liquidity and decentralized trading mechanisms, enabling various DeFi innovations. Recently, projects like the memecoin launchpad pump.fun have shown interest in creating use case-specific AMMs, moving away from third-party platforms.

To understand this trend, we need to delve into how AMMs operate, the problems they address, and the strategic benefits of customizing liquidity mechanisms to align with project goals.

AMMs eliminate the traditional finance (TradFi) order book model, replacing it with liquidity pools—user-supplied reserves of tokens (usually equal in value in constant-product models) locked within smart contracts. Instead of directly matching buy and sell orders, AMMs facilitate trades through formulas that dynamically determine token prices based on their relative quantities in each pool.

A common AMM model uses the constant-product market maker algorithm, mathematically expressed as x * y = k. Here, x and y represent the reserve balances of two tokens in the liquidity pool, while k signifies a constant derived from the product of these reserves.

When a user conducts a trade, exchanging token x for token y (or vice versa), the quantities shift, changing the ratio of tokens in the pool. To maintain the invariant constant (k), the AMM algorithm dynamically adjusts the price, ensuring the product of the token quantities remains stable post-trade.

For simplicity, one might think of this process as happening through magic, indiscernible to all but the most learned followers of the occult. Regardless, the outcome remains the same: at the end of a trade, the liquidity pool always stays balanced according to the AMM’s rules. This balance keeps a continuous state of liquidity and predictable token pricing without relying on centralized counterparts. Abracadabra.

However, this model presents certain trade-offs. One such trade-off is impermanent loss, which can arise due to price fluctuations that alter token ratios. AMMs generally require significant liquidity to minimize slippage (the difference between expected and actual trade prices). When a liquidity pool has limited reserves, even minor trades can significantly impact the token ratio, causing notable price changes during execution.