Multicoin Capital’s Proposal on Solana Emissions Mechanism

This is a segment from the Lightspeed newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.

Multicoin Capital’s proposal to modify Solana’s emissions mechanism, introduced in January, has generally received positive feedback. However, as the vote approaches, criticism is surfacing.

Among the notable skeptics is Lily Liu, president of the Solana Foundation. In a recent X spaces debate, Liu emphasized the need for a more comprehensive perspective on inflation, warning that unpredictable staking rewards might deter institutional investors.

SIMD-0228, a Solana governance proposal drafted by Multicoin Capital and led by Anza economist Max Resnick, aims to replace Solana’s current fixed emissions curve with a market-driven model that adjusts inflation based on the proportion of Solana being staked.

Currently, Solana distributes SOL to block proposers, who then pass the inflation to SOL holders staking with them. However, some SOL is lost along the way due to tax obligations and fees from centralized exchanges. Resnick compares these losses to water leaking from a bucket.

The SIMD-0228 proposal proposes to reduce Solana’s inflation from 4.5% to below 1% based on current staking levels, thereby minimizing the ‘leakage’. It targets a 50% staking ratio, down from the existing 63%, with lower emissions expected overall.

Unsurprisingly, given its potential impact on validator revenue, SIMD-0228 has attracted criticism. Liu’s concerns revolve around the inadequate data collection and impact analysis of SIMD-0228, as well as the possibility that variable staking rewards could deter large investors. Liu noted that “widely fluctuating yields turned away institutional demand” from ATOM, which recently adopted a similar market-based emission approach.

In the Tuesday afternoon debate, Liu reiterated her stance.