U.S. Federal Government Spending Outlook for Fiscal 2024
The U.S. federal government’s $6.8 trillion spending in fiscal 2024 is unlikely to see significant cuts next year, despite calls for restraint, as structural and political obstacles remain, analysts say.
Mandatory Spending
Mandatory spending, which includes programs like Social Security and Medicare, accounted for $4.1 trillion in 2024. Economists at Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) indicated that reducing these outlays is improbable given their enduring popularity and the political risk of curbing benefits for senior citizens.
– Social Security alone cost $1.4 trillion.
– Medicare outlays reached $900 billion.
– Medicaid and other mandatory programs, including veterans’ benefits and retirement pay, added another $800 billion.
Interest payments on the national debt, totaling $950 billion, cannot be reduced without risking a financial crisis, the report said.
Discretionary Spending
Discretionary spending totaled $1.8 trillion, offering limited room for cuts. Defense spending, which comprised nearly half of that sum, stands at 3% of GDP, a post-Cold War low.
> “A major reduction in what Congress allocates to the Pentagon does not seem likely in today's geopolitical environment,” the note added.
Non-defense discretionary spending, funding agencies like NASA, the IRS, and border security, is already near historical lows at 3% of GDP.
The compensation of federal employees, representing less than 6% of total spending, also offers little fiscal relief, with half the workforce concentrated in defense, veterans’ affairs, and homeland security.
Congressional Action Required
Any significant spending cuts would require congressional action, often necessitating 60 Senate votes. While the president can reverse executive actions, economists argue that the savings would pale in comparison to the $26 trillion deficit projected over the next decade.
> “We think some reductions in federal spending and employment on the margin are plausible over the next couple of years, but probably not on the scale that they will have large implications for a U.S. economy.”
Comments (0)